ELECTION 2010: Sadiq Khan - Labour’s the only way for British Muslims Print E-mail
Monday, 03 May 2010 17:45
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

By Sadiq Khan

Labour is, and always has been the Party of British Muslims, and indeed that of all religious and ethnic minorities.


Originally published by Left Foot Forward

Sadiq KhanI don’t pretend we’ve been perfect – indeed, in terms of our relationship with British Muslims there have been some problems – but I do believe if you really look at our record and that of the other parties you’ll agree that for British Muslims, Labour’s the only way to go. Something new always has a draw, an excitement. And it’s easy to think of the Liberal Democrats as being a left-wing option, one that has not been tainted by power. But before deciding to switch take a look of the details of what they’ve actually said and done.

Labour believes, and always has believed, that it is our duty to promote equality and to tackle the problems faced by the most vulnerable in society. This isn’t empty rhetoric, Labour Governments have delivered time and time again, from founding the NHS to introducing the minimum wage. So it’s no surprise that we’ve always had a strong relationship with the British Muslim Diaspora.


It was a Labour Government that gave independence to India and Pakistan; it was Labour-friendly trade-unions that encouraged new arrivals to become union members and improve their working conditions; and it was a Labour Government that passed the first ever laws outlawing discrimination on the grounds of race. And over the past thirteen years we’ve continued to deliver. But not with the support of the Lib-Dems.


We’ve brought the law up to date to prevent discrimination on the basis of religion. The Racial & Religious Hatred Act’s made it illegal to threaten people because of their religion or to stir up hatred against a person because of their faith. The Liberal Democrats voted against our original proposals and have diluted the provisions of this Act (as did the Conservatives). Labour’s made it illegal to discriminate against someone because of their religion or belief in employment or when accessing goods and services. And we have now passed the Single Equality Act – although the Liberal Democrats tried to scupper a key part of this that helps Muslims.


In areas where minority ethnic communities are disproportionately excluded, we’ve introduced targeted programmes. The ‘Race for Health’ programme is helping to drive forward improvements in health for minority ethnic people. The Minority Ethnic Achievement Programme helped narrow the gap in educational attainment between minority ethnic pupils and the national average.


Like many others, I believe the invasion of Iraq was wrong and Labour must, and is, working to repair its relationship with Britain’s Muslims which has been damaged by the war. I was pleased that one of the first Acts Gordon Brown did when he became Prime Minister was to withdraw British troops from Iraq.


While the war in Iraq, and other aspects of our Foreign Policy. remain a huge issue, don’t let this obscure the work the Government has done for Muslims abroad. Bilateral Aid to Bangladesh and Pakistan has doubled and we continue to provide millions in humanitarian support in Gaza. Overall, Labour has trebled the aid budget since 1997, we’ve cancelled debt and increased trade with the poorest countries.


Looking at the makeup of the parties is illuminating too. Labour’s had the first black MP, the first Muslim MP, the first Black Cabinet Minister, the first black Leader of the Lords, and the first Asian Minister in the Commons. I’ve been lucky enough to be the first Asian, and Muslim, Minister to attend Cabinet. And we have dozens of Parliamentary candidates of Muslim faith standing in safe seats at this election. The Lib-Dems don’t have a single Black or Asian MP and are nowhere near having one.


So, come May 6th, I urge you to think about which party has done the most for British Muslims in the past, and with whom you can trust your future.

Rt Hon Sadiq Khan has been Member of Parliament for Tooting since 2005 and is Labour candidate again in 2010

Last Updated on Monday, 03 May 2010 18:21
 
Comments (3)
Labour is not the way for British Muslims
3 Saturday, 08 May 2010 13:54
Mushtaq Quraishi
Many muslim Labour candidates in local and national elections attempt to use the 'Labour's the only way forward for British Muslims' argument to woo voters. But it is clear to everyone that the Labour Party does not represent the interest of British Muslims.
The illegal war in Iraq has led to many innocent Muslim lives being taken in Iraq and places like Afghanistan thanks largely down to New Labour. How is this good for Muslims? The fact is Sadiq Khan that you are standing for a party who have if anything gone against the wishes of the Muslim people in this country. The fact that you continue to support such a party leads me to think you are immoral, have no conscience and have the blood of your fellow Muslim brothers and sisters on your hands.
If Labour is the way for Muslims, why has it introduced years worth of anti-terror legislation which affects the Muslim population more than any other? Why is it that Muslims can now have their houses searched because they 'seem' like terrorists? How many Muslim houses have been searched under anti-terror laws where they have been found innocent? The fact is that the Muzlim population are vulnerable to being searched and raided, having their reputation tarnished - all for nothing. How does this suggest that Labour is the way forward for Muslims?
The Labour government continues to support Israel whilst Muslims are murdered in the middle-east. Do you support this Sadiq Khan? If not, then why do you represent a party that is clearly against the people of your religion?
It does not matter to me that you stand as a Labour candidate. You are entitled to do so. But the fact that you are trying to gain Muslim votes by being dishonest is actually quite un-Islamic in itslef and in reality quite disgraceful.
Civil Liberties
2 Monday, 03 May 2010 21:31
Ousman Noor
The Labour party has an atrocious record on Civil Liberties which have undermined the protections afforded to the 'most vulnerable people in society' which the UK had developed over centuries.

The Labour party was responsible for increasing the days in which suspects can be detained without being charged to 28 days and made efforts to double that amount. A gross attack on the rule of law previously enshrined by centuries of constitutional and judicial efforts.

The Labour party is also wasting billions on introducing ID cards which serve to supervise and monitor incoming immigrants.

The Labour party introduced hundreds of thousands of surveillance cameras across the country. There are now up to 4.2m CCTV cameras in Britain - about one for every 14 people. The surveillance is used for US security agencies monitoring telecommunications traffic passing through Britain, to key stroke information used to gauge work rates and GPS information tracking company vehicles,

The Labour part fought tooth and nail to prevent the disclosure of information relating to the torture of Binyam Mohammed. The Labour party has been scrutinized by the UN and various human rights agencies for being complicit in torture

Sadiq Khan - civil liberties are there to protect vulnerable people in society. Labour is NOT doing this.
independence
1 Monday, 03 May 2010 21:17
Ousman Noor
The article claims that the Labour party is the best option for Muslims as they gave independence to India and Pakistan. I find this disgusting for the following reasons

(a) By 'giving' independence he suggests that India and Pakistan belonged to Britain and was theirs to benevolently give to the people.

Those who fought for the independence of Pakistan and India did so because they were claiming back what was rightfully theirs. Taking away the rights and liberties of millions of people and giving them back hundreds of years later is NOT something that Britain can feel smug about.

(b) By using this statement to show 'why muslims should like Britain', he infers that Muslims should be grateful to Britiain

Millions of Indians and Pakistanis celebrated the end of foreign rule by a colonial power. Independence had been demanded decades previously and thousands died in this pursuit. To suggest that Muslims should be grateful is like thanking a burglar for wiping his feet before entering your living room.

(c) By using this statement in the context of why Muslims should vote for the Labour Party he suggests that it was because of the labour party that independence was given.

Actually, it was because of the protesters of all backgrounds who collectively resisted, many giving their lives for the cause of independence. It was also because of promises made by the British that they would leave if India supported the British in all their wars and also because after WW2 Britain was so far in debt that it could not afford to continue colonial rule in India. To suggest that it was because of the Labour party is extremely patronising and undermines those of who gave their lives for independence struggle.


Sadiq Khan - your article is disgusting

Add your comment

Your name:
Your email:
Subject:
Comment:
<